No GMO's in Vermont  

"Vermonters call a time out on genetically engineered crops!"
   Home
   Who We Are
   TAKE ACTION
      EVENT CALENDAR
      Town_to_Town
      Letters to Editor
   News
   Press Releases
   Educational    Resources
       Other Legislation
GMO Free Farming & Gardening
   Contact Us
~ VPIRG REPORTS ~
Blowing in the Wind
GMO Final Report
~ NEW NEWSLETTER ~
TIME OUT TIMES
FALL ISSUE
SUMMER ISSUE

No GMO's in VERMONT
Genetically Engineering GMO's

Agriculture Commissioner is missing the point on GE seeds : By Annie Christopher

http://www.timesargus.com/04/Commentary/Story/81349.html

Times Argus Commentary
Agriculture Commissioner is missing the point on GE seeds - Mar. 30, 2004
By Annie Christopher
----------
On Feb. 4, I testified before the House Agriculture Committee regarding
mandatory labeling of products containing genetically engineered (GE)
ingredients. I am co-owner with my husband, Peter Backman, of Annie's
Naturals, located in North Calais. We have been manufacturing natural
and organic salad dressings for 20 years, and our products are now the
best-selling dressings in the natural food market and rank fifth in
traditional grocery stores.

At the hearing, I testified that consumers have a right to know if
products they purchase and consume contain GE ingredients. I also
testified that a major ingredient of our products is non-GE canola oil,
which we purchase in Canada, and for which we pay three times as much as
we would if we were buying conventional canola oil.
I would like to respond to a comment that Agriculture Commissioner Steve
Kerr made about the hearing in the story titled " 'GE' crop foes cite
damage to Vermont image." Commissioner Kerr is quoted as saying, "If
we're concerned about Vermont agriculture, we need to focus on companies
that use Vermont farm products as ingredients, as opposed to companies
that import their ingredients to obtain the cachet of the Vermont
label."

Commissioner Kerr's comments are an obvious swipe at Annie's Naturals
and other Vermont specialty food companies, as well as the GE issue in
general. His statement misses the point of the hearing entirely and is
way off base.

With regard to the so-called cachet of our company, our "cachet" is
based on a long history of stewardship in the state. Annie's Naturals is
located in North Calais at The Foster Homestead, which is still an
operating dairy farm. The farm has been in Peter's family for seven
generations. George Washington Foster settled with his wife Polly Kelton
in the early 1800s, and he was one of the first legislators in the
state. Their descendents have served the state and our community for
any generations, and Annie's Naturals is only the most recent chapter
of a very long history of agricultural-related activities at the Foster
Homestead.

In fact, I was one of the original organizers of the Vermont Specialty
Food Association. For Commissioner Kerr to suggest that Annie's Naturals
is obtaining the cachet of the Vermont label in some unfair way is
undeserved. Our company pays taxes, employs people, purchases organic
and all-natural ingredients from Vermont farmers whenever possible, and
makes numerous financial contributions to nonprofits in the surrounding
communities.

Why did I testify for the need for mandatory labeling of GE ingredients,
as well as a moratorium on GE seed? I have been in the specialty foods
and natural foods business for 20 years, and I hear from our consumers
every day, who call us regarding what they want in the products they
eat. Consumers have, historically, been the driving force behind
labeling laws, and I hear it all the time - they want to know if what
they are eating contains GE ingredients.

Commissioner Kerr says he wants to focus on companies that use Vermont
farm products as ingredients. But what about the farmers who buy grain
and hay from out of state and Canada to feed their cows to make milk?
How are their businesses different from ours? We buy non-GE canola oil
in Canada to make salad dressing, in part, because we cannot obtain it
in state and because our Canadian source is guaranteed non-GE.
In addition to consumers, the GE issue affects all farmers, so why do
farmers use GE seed? In part, because it was given to them by seed
manufacturers who promised farmers that GE seed would be resistant to a
variety of substances, including weed herbicide. But then Mother Nature
can create a weed to which the GE seed isn't resistant, and farmers are
now back at square one.

GE seed will contaminate a non-GE crop - that is a fact. So who is going
to pay for the cross-contamination? No one has answered this question
yet. Certainly no insurance company is going to insure it. Will the
State of Vermont pay for it? The taxpayers? Farmers are taxpayers, and
if there is one single thing all farmers want, it's lower taxes.
Conventional (non-GE) and organic farmers will bear the cost of
ontamination because they will not be able to sell their crops as
GE-free. Who is going to compensate them?

From what I can find out about Commissioner Kerr's background, he has
never farmed nor has he owned a business (I asked his office for his
resume four weeks ago and never received it.). Why is he the
commissioner of Agriculture? I think we may have two problems here: The
GE issue, and a commissioner whose job history may not qualify him to be
the commissioner of agriculture.

Annie Christopher is co-owner of Annie's Naturals on Foster Hill Road in North Calais.

BURLINGTON FREE PRESS, 4-06-05
Farmer Protection Act: Victory in the State Senate! 4-06-05
Article
200 Vermonters March On Montpelier - 8 More TOWNS sign on!
SOLD! : Giant Real Estate Sign Posted on Statehouse Lawn;
Monsanto abandons worldwide GM wheat project
Activists Swarm Statehouse with 100 yellow balloons; ‘Serve papers’ on lawmakers for “Patent Infring
Full Page Ad Slams Douglas Corporate Farm Policy:
Vermont Statehouse Contaminated!
Douglas signs nation's first GMO labeling law
A VICTORY FOR VERMONT AGRICULTURE: Governor to sign
Vermont & Quebec Farmers Unfurl Giant Banner at US/Canada Border
April 16 - 17 Protest Pictures: ENLARGED
State bill labels genetically altered seed : Washington Times
Agriculture Commissioner is missing the point on GE seeds : By Annie Christopher
Farmers Fight for Protections from GMOs and corporate lawsuits
BOSTON.com article
VT Farmer Protection GMO Liability Passes
Mendocino County voters ban biotech crops
Seeds Of Deception by Jeffery Smith Book Tour

Print PageBack To Top

Recommend Us
Home | Who We Are | Take Action | Event Calendar | Town_to_Town | Letters to Editor | News | Press Releases
Educational Resources | Other Legislation | Contact Us

 

 
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Good Day:
This site is currently under construction.
Our goal is to become
a hub site for local events while continuing to provide legislative updates.
Thank you.

 


Other GE Free Web Sites:

www.gefreemaine.org

www.gmofreemendo.org

www.nerage.org

www.biotechimc.org

www.biodev.org

www.non-gm-farmers.com

www.acgefree.uni.cc

www.nffc.net

www.ruralvermont.org

 

All Content Provided by Member Organizations
Site Created by:VtWebDesigners.com